Skip to content
News

Ferrari Tipo F134: the rare three-cylinder two-stroke engine

Red Ferrari Tipo F134 sports car displayed in a showroom with sleek design and yellow brake calipers.
In this article
  1. Ferrari Tipo F134: a two-stroke test engine
  2. A concentration of sophistication
  3. Supercharging and the intended V6

When we think of engines developed by Ferrari, we picture legendary, large V12s and V8s, rather than compact three-cylinder units: the Tipo F134 is the exception.

Developed during the 1990s, the Tipo F134 was almost certainly not intended to herald a Ferrari three-cylinder production engine - decades before such engines became widespread. Instead, it emerged from the need to test and validate new technological solutions.

This did not require building a complete engine, only part of one. That explains the Tipo F134: it represented half of the V6 ultimately envisaged.

Ferrari Tipo F134: a two-stroke test engine

The innovative character of this three-cylinder engine, with a capacity of just 1.3 litres, came from its two-stroke layout and supercharger.

We tend to associate two-stroke engines with motorcycles rather than cars, although they have also been used in automobiles. They offer several benefits: they are more compact, lighter and simpler, while potentially delivering greater thermal efficiency than the four-stroke engines fitted to our cars.

However, one of the key reasons they have “disappeared”, even from motorcycles, concerns the pollution they produce. This is largely caused by the fuel-oil mixture they use, as well as fuel wasted when the engine operates outside its optimum range.

During the 1990s, though, the automotive industry showed renewed interest in the two-stroke engine, with several manufacturers investing in its development. As the Tipo F134 demonstrates, Ferrari also investigated this possible evolution of the internal-combustion engine.

A concentration of sophistication

We can now explore Ferrari's Tipo F134 in greater depth through the Drivetribe video below.

Well-known presenter Mike Fernie introduces this rare engine and reveals how far ahead Ferrari was in reducing or eliminating the drawbacks traditionally linked to two-stroke engines.

For instance, the small three-cylinder unit already used multipoint injection instead of a carburettor. And, despite two-stroke engines not requiring them, it was fitted with exhaust valves operated by a camshaft.

Supercharging and the intended V6

One crucial element in allowing this “reinvented” two-stroke to meet its power and emissions targets was the addition of a supercharger. Besides increasing the volume of intake air, it was also essential for clearing exhaust gases, improving combustion efficiency.

The Tipo F134 produced 130 hp. With its 1.3-litre capacity, that equated to 100 hp/litre, which would have meant 260 hp for the intended V6 - a 2.6-litre unit comprising two 1.3-litre banks arranged in a “V”.

Even at the time, these were not exceptional figures, at least for a supercar. The Ferrari F40, fitted with a 2.9-litre twin-turbo V8, achieved 162.8 hp/litre.

That lends credibility to rumours that Ferrari examined a turbocharged Tipo F134 variant, which would have raised output to 216 hp - equivalent to 166 hp/litre, or 432 hp when once again considering the V6.

History shows that the Tipo F134 never became a production engine. Yet, at a time when even Formula 1's technical director has raised the possibility of the championship using two-stroke engines with solutions similar to those seen in this three-cylinder unit, could Ferrari revisit the lessons learned during its development?

Trending now

Oliver Kensington

Oliver Kensington is an automotive journalist and Subaru specialist with over a decade of experience covering Japanese performance engineering, all-wheel-drive systems and practical vehicle maintenance. He contributes expert insight to autotecnica subaru.co, with particular interests in Subaru servicing, model comparisons, aftermarket upgrades and the marque’s motorsport heritage.

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Leave a Comment